Because, in fact, I also see a deep, and human, need for culture. It roots us, and tells us who we are. Unfortunately, it all too often tells us who we are not. That is - we are not that group of people over there . . . this is the negative-side of culture, but all cultural tradition is conservative by definition.
But in the end, I believe that cultural freedom is important and necessary, even if it is conservative in its nature. So, going back to what I was writing yesterday, I do actually admire and believe in the strength giving aspects of Chicanoism, Black Nationalism, Boricuaism, etc. I also think there is something to be said for Americanism. But I think all of these cultural traditions need to be placed within a context that allows for challenges to the cultural norm: that sees the cultural as inclusive as opposed to exclusive, that doesn't define itself by what it is not.
But I also am considering the possibility (I am unsure of the answer) that culture, again by definition, does exactly what I fear: define itself by what it is not. Culture is inherently exclusive. Which pushes me towards a nihilistic approach: fuck everything, burn it all to the ground - a position of absolute opposition to everything and everyone.
But, fearless reader, I am yet an optimist, and I think this is where my pragmatism and my optimism go hand in hand: I don't seek perfection - just improvement. Perhaps culture will never (can never) be defined other than by what it is not . . . but it can do better than it does now.
No comments:
Post a Comment